[SASC] Join Us in Supporting Graywater Use

FWD: [SASC] Join Us in Supporting Graywater Use

Dear Fellow Sustainability Advocates:

 

During our regular meeting on October 27, the Sustainability Alliance of Southern California adopted the following official policy position regarding graywater use in Southern California:

 

"It is the policy of the Sustainability Alliance of Southern California to promote maximum implementation of graywater systems in Southern California.  We encourage all jurisdictions within Southern California to proactively support regulatory approval for graywater systems and that incentives, including cash rebates, sewage rate reductions, or reduction in water rates, be evaluated."

 

We are taking this position of support for graywater reuse for a number of reasons: 

 

1) Simplest way to reclaim and reuse a valuable resource without expensive treatment and re-distribution.

2) Provides a readily available water source for irrigation of yards and greenbelts.

3) Conserves our most precious resource—fresh, potable water.

4) Cuts down on the amount of electricity needed to move water to and throughout our region.

5) Reduces the amount of wastewater that needs to be treated at publicly owned treatment works resulting in less effluent disposed of through ocean outfalls.

6) Less water treated translates to a reduction in related treatment costs and chemicals used in the treatment process.

 

Supporting this policy now makes sense because...

1) California is in a declared State of Emergency due to extended drought conditions and much needed, potable water is used to irrigate residential landscapes.

2) Statewide legislation supporting use of graywater was recently incorporated into existing building codes, 'opting in' every municipality for graywater use. To opt out, a municipality must hold a public hearing and show just cause for restricting or eliminating graywater use.

 

a) SB 1258 (which was signed into law in September 2008) directed the Housing and Community Development (HCD) agency to propose building standards for the construction, installation, and alteration of graywater systems for residential indoor and outdoor uses to the California Building Standards Commission (CBSC). Existing graywater standards contained in the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, California Plumbing Code, Part 5, Appendix G were based on requirements for private sewage disposal. These standards were found to be overly prescriptive and antiquated and not readily usable by people seeking to install graywater systems for the purpose of water conservation and reuse.

 

b) The emergency graywater regulations, which added Chapter 16A, Part I "Nonpotable Water Reuse Systems,” were approved by the CBSC on July 30, 2009. The emergency regulations were subsequently filed with the Secretary of State on August 4, 2009, effective immediately upon filing.

 

 The two most significant changes in the new regulations:

1) Single Fixture Systems (such as clothes washers) no longer require a permit and

2) Irrigation lines no longer have to be buried 9 inches, but can simply be placed under 2 inches of mulch.

Considerations for graywater use:

1)    It’s best to use non-chlorine bleach when washing clothes.

2)    Distribute graywater as widely as possible rather than concentrate (such as in a trench), choosing which zones to saturate, either automatically, or by hand. 

3)    For optimal results, blend subsoil with a thick layer of bio-dynamic organic matter/topsoil and cover with 1-2 inches of mulch. 

 

Advocates are encouraged to have impact on this issue by:

 

1) Getting your city council to put the item on their calendar and providing supporting testimony during the formal discussion and vote about whether to adopt the policy position for your city/county.

 

2) Getting your organization or group to begin promoting graywater use. If so inclined, you can adopt the policy position above.

 

 

Thank you for your help guiding our region to implement sustainable practices.

 

In Partnership for Sustainability,

 

Anne

--
Anne Tolch
(619) 518-3178
Communication Director

The Sustainability Alliance of Southern California

Sustainability for the Region and Beyond

 

 

Delta Vision Foundation Analysis of Delta/Water Legislation

Significant progress made toward Delta ecosystem restoration and a more reliable water system for California

The Delta Vision Foundation is very pleased that all seven goals of the Delta Vision Strategic Plan[1] are incorporated into the Delta/water policy bills, enacted by the Legislature on November 4, 2009.
 
Importantly, the legislation recognizes the need for linked action in several important areas, as strongly recommended by the Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force. The seven goals are:
1.    Make the co-equal goals of water supply reliability and ecosystem restoration the legal foundation of Delta and water policy making.
2.    Recognize and enhance the unique cultural, recreational and agricultural values of the California Delta as an evolving place, an action critical to achieving the co-equal goals.
3.    Restore the Delta ecosystem as the heart of a healthy estuary.
4.    Promote statewide water conservation, efficiency and sustainable use.
5.    Build facilities to improve the existing water conveyance system and expand statewide storage; operate both to achieve the co-equal goals.
6.    Reduce risks to people, property and state interests in the Delta by effective emergency preparedness, appropriate land uses and strategic levee investments.
7.    Establish a new governance structure with the authority, responsibility, accountability, science support and secure funding to achieve these goals.
 
Phil Isenberg, Chair of the Delta Vision Foundation, applauded the successful passage of these policies, noting that old patterns of downplaying Delta and other ecosystem needs, while behaving as if water supplies were inexhaustible, had resulted in less reliable water supplies for all Californians and a gravely impaired Delta ecosystem.
 
“Passage of a package addressing all seven goals of Delta Vision is very welcome progress,” Isenberg stated.  “As these bills are implemented, we will learn what else needs to be done to ensure the desired results.  The members of the Delta Vision Foundation are heartened at this major step toward Delta ecosystem health and a more secure water future for all Californians.”
 
Brief synopsis of the bills as they relate to the Delta Vision Goals:
SB1 7x (Simitian and Steinberg) adopted the co-equal goals of water system reliability and an improved Delta ecosystem (goal 1).  The legislation adopts significant governance reforms (goal 7) and also recognizes and enhances the Delta as a place (goal 2) by:
a) Modifying the composition and roles of the existing Delta Protection Commission and ensuring their right to participate in development of the new Delta Plan (goal 2),
b) Establishing a new Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Conservancy, a primary state agency to implement ecosystem restoration in the Delta and to support economic sustainability of the Delta (goals 2 and 3) and a Delta Investment Fund (goal 2),
c) Establishing a new seven person Delta Stewardship Council as an independent agency of the state, and directing the Council to adopt and overseeing implementation of a comprehensive management plan for the Delta (Delta Plan).  The legislation also establishes procedures by which state and local actions will become consistent with the Delta Plan. The bill transfers existing authority and programs of the California Bay Delta Authority to the Council and abolishes the Authority. The bill importantly establishes a Delta science program and Delta Independent Science Board (goals 1, 3, 7).
d) The bill imposes several significant requirements on the Bay Delta Conservation Plan if it is to be incorporated in the Delta Plan (goals 5 and 3), and requires the State Water Resources Control Board to establish an effective system of Delta watershed diversion data collection and to establish flow criteria for the Delta watershed (goals 3 and 4).
e) The bill directs the Council to incorporate flood control and other requirement to protect life, property and the Delta ecosystem and water supply system (Goal 6).

SB 2 7x (Cogdill) authorizes issuance of general obligation bonds in the amount of $11.1 billion.  The bill includes these broad allocations (then sub-allocated by program and geography):

• Drought relief   $455,000,000   
• Water supply reliability   $1,050,000,000   
• Delta sustainability   $2,250,000,000   
• Statewide water system operational improvement   $3,000,000,000   
• Conservation and watershed protection   $1,785,000,000   
• Groundwater protection and water quality   $1,000,000,000
• Water recycling program   $1,000,000,000  

This bill includes language restricting eligibility to bond funds to districts complying with water management plan requirements.

SB 6 7x (Steinberg and Pavley) focuses on groundwater (goal 4) an area where California currently lacks information required to make effective policy and lags all other western states in the reporting and monitoring of  ground water use. The bill establishes a program in the Department of Water Resources to work with local water districts to establish ground water monitoring and includes language making urban and agricultural water suppliers ineligible for a water grant or loan administered by the state unless complying with provisions of the act.
 
SB 7 7x (Steinberg) requires the state to achieve a 20% reduction in urban per capita water use by December 31, 2020 (goal 4). Incremental progress is required of at least 10% reduction by December 31, 2015. Agricultural water suppliers are required to implement efficient water management practices.  Standardized reporting will be required and, with some exceptions, urban and agricultural water suppliers would be ineligible for state water grants or loans unless they comply with the bill’s water conservation requirements.
 
SB 8 7x (Steinberg) strengthens current law which requires the report of  water diversion and use (goal 4), adding penalties for failure to report and removing some exemptions from report requirements. The bill also continuously appropriates $3,750,000 annually from fee revenue to fund new permanent water right enforcement positions, a significant change protecting the integrity of the water rights system (goals 1, 3 and 4).                  
 

###

The Delta Vision Foundation is the successor to the Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force, the independent body established under Governor’s Executive Order S-17-06. The Blue Ribbon Task Force held over 30 days of public meetings over two years, and involved hundreds of stakeholders, scientists and members of the public in its processes. It issued Our Vision for the California Delta (2007) and the Delta Vision Strategic Plan (2008). The Delta Vision Committee (cabinet officers) issued its Delta Vision Committee Implementation Report (2008) supporting almost all of those recommendations.
 
The goal of the Delta Vision Foundation is to maintain the visibility and viability of final recommendations of the Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force, and encourage the public policy process to utilize those recommendations. The Foundation issues reports and participates in policy processes, but takes no formal position on legislation. The Foundation provides information to help policy makers act to restore the Delta and provide a more reliable water supply for California. For more information, visit the Delta Vision Foundation website at: http://www.deltavisionfoundation.org/
 -------

[1]  The Delta Vision Strategic Plan was adopted October 2008 by the Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force. http://deltavision.ca.gov/StrategicPlanningProcess/StaffDraft/Delta_Vision_Strategic_Plan_standard_resolution.pdf

Killing The Water!

Animal waste is polluting our water ways at an alarming rate - so much that our coastal waters are rapidly turning into areas that cannot support life. The map below shows the hypoxic zones around the coastlines of the world in 2006.  This problem has proliferated, there are nearly 400 that have formed around the world, 40 of which surround the US. 

Check out a recent article from the Wall Street Journal focusing in on how the Chesapeak Bay is being impacted by animal waste, and what some people are doing about it.